| .. |
|
0,0,256,256/256,/0
|
iiiftilesource now uses pixel-based syntax 'w,'. level 1 compliance it still required, so backward compatability should not be an issue
|
2013-10-05 15:02:26 -04:00 |
|
0,0,512,512/256,/0
|
iiiftilesource now uses pixel-based syntax 'w,'. level 1 compliance it still required, so backward compatability should not be an issue
|
2013-10-05 15:02:26 -04:00 |
|
0,0,775,1024/194,/0
|
iiiftilesource now uses pixel-based syntax 'w,'. level 1 compliance it still required, so backward compatability should not be an issue
|
2013-10-05 15:02:26 -04:00 |
|
0,256,256,256/256,/0
|
iiiftilesource now uses pixel-based syntax 'w,'. level 1 compliance it still required, so backward compatability should not be an issue
|
2013-10-05 15:02:26 -04:00 |
|
0,512,256,256/256,/0
|
iiiftilesource now uses pixel-based syntax 'w,'. level 1 compliance it still required, so backward compatability should not be an issue
|
2013-10-05 15:02:26 -04:00 |
|
0,512,512,512/256,/0
|
iiiftilesource now uses pixel-based syntax 'w,'. level 1 compliance it still required, so backward compatability should not be an issue
|
2013-10-05 15:02:26 -04:00 |
|
0,768,256,256/256,/0
|
iiiftilesource now uses pixel-based syntax 'w,'. level 1 compliance it still required, so backward compatability should not be an issue
|
2013-10-05 15:02:26 -04:00 |
|
256,0,256,256/256,/0
|
iiiftilesource now uses pixel-based syntax 'w,'. level 1 compliance it still required, so backward compatability should not be an issue
|
2013-10-05 15:02:26 -04:00 |
|
256,256,256,256/256,/0
|
iiiftilesource now uses pixel-based syntax 'w,'. level 1 compliance it still required, so backward compatability should not be an issue
|
2013-10-05 15:02:26 -04:00 |
|
256,512,256,256/256,/0
|
iiiftilesource now uses pixel-based syntax 'w,'. level 1 compliance it still required, so backward compatability should not be an issue
|
2013-10-05 15:02:26 -04:00 |
|
256,768,256,256/256,/0
|
iiiftilesource now uses pixel-based syntax 'w,'. level 1 compliance it still required, so backward compatability should not be an issue
|
2013-10-05 15:02:26 -04:00 |
|
512,0,256,256/256,/0
|
iiiftilesource now uses pixel-based syntax 'w,'. level 1 compliance it still required, so backward compatability should not be an issue
|
2013-10-05 15:02:26 -04:00 |
|
512,0,263,512/132,/0
|
iiiftilesource now uses pixel-based syntax 'w,'. level 1 compliance it still required, so backward compatability should not be an issue
|
2013-10-05 15:02:26 -04:00 |
|
512,256,256,256/256,/0
|
iiiftilesource now uses pixel-based syntax 'w,'. level 1 compliance it still required, so backward compatability should not be an issue
|
2013-10-05 15:02:26 -04:00 |
|
512,512,256,256/256,/0
|
iiiftilesource now uses pixel-based syntax 'w,'. level 1 compliance it still required, so backward compatability should not be an issue
|
2013-10-05 15:02:26 -04:00 |
|
512,512,263,512/132,/0
|
iiiftilesource now uses pixel-based syntax 'w,'. level 1 compliance it still required, so backward compatability should not be an issue
|
2013-10-05 15:02:26 -04:00 |
|
512,768,256,256/256,/0
|
iiiftilesource now uses pixel-based syntax 'w,'. level 1 compliance it still required, so backward compatability should not be an issue
|
2013-10-05 15:02:26 -04:00 |
|
768,0,7,256/7,/0
|
iiiftilesource now uses pixel-based syntax 'w,'. level 1 compliance it still required, so backward compatability should not be an issue
|
2013-10-05 15:02:26 -04:00 |
|
768,256,7,256/7,/0
|
iiiftilesource now uses pixel-based syntax 'w,'. level 1 compliance it still required, so backward compatability should not be an issue
|
2013-10-05 15:02:26 -04:00 |
|
768,512,7,256/7,/0
|
iiiftilesource now uses pixel-based syntax 'w,'. level 1 compliance it still required, so backward compatability should not be an issue
|
2013-10-05 15:02:26 -04:00 |
|
768,768,7,256/7,/0
|
iiiftilesource now uses pixel-based syntax 'w,'. level 1 compliance it still required, so backward compatability should not be an issue
|
2013-10-05 15:02:26 -04:00 |
|
full
|
iiiftilesource now uses pixel-based syntax 'w,'. level 1 compliance it still required, so backward compatability should not be an issue
|
2013-10-05 15:02:26 -04:00 |
