mirror of
https://github.com/klzgrad/naiveproxy.git
synced 2024-11-29 00:36:10 +03:00
1231 lines
54 KiB
Python
1231 lines
54 KiB
Python
|
# Copyright 2016 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
|
||
|
# Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
|
||
|
# found in the LICENSE file.
|
||
|
|
||
|
'''Generates a test suite from NIST PKITS test descriptions.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The output is a set of Type Parameterized Tests which are included by
|
||
|
pkits_unittest.h. See pkits_unittest.h for information on using the tests.
|
||
|
GoogleTest has a limit of 50 tests per type parameterized testcase, so the tests
|
||
|
are split up by section number (this also makes it possible to easily skip
|
||
|
sections that pertain to non-implemented features).
|
||
|
|
||
|
Usage:
|
||
|
generate_tests.py <PKITS.pdf> <output.h>
|
||
|
'''
|
||
|
|
||
|
import os
|
||
|
import re
|
||
|
import subprocess
|
||
|
import sys
|
||
|
import tempfile
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
def sanitize_name(s):
|
||
|
return s.translate(None, ' -')
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
def finalize_test_case(test_case_name, sanitized_test_names, output):
|
||
|
output.write('\nWRAPPED_REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(%s' % test_case_name)
|
||
|
for name in sanitized_test_names:
|
||
|
output.write(',\n %s' % name)
|
||
|
output.write(');\n')
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
def bool_to_str(b):
|
||
|
return "true" if b else "false"
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
def make_policies_string(policies):
|
||
|
return '"' + ','.join(policies) + '"'
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
def output_test(test_case_name, test_number, raw_test_name, subpart_number,
|
||
|
info, certs, crls, sanitized_test_names, output):
|
||
|
'''Writes a test case to |output|, and appends the test name to
|
||
|
|sanitized_test_names|.'''
|
||
|
sanitized_test_name = 'Section%s%s' % (test_number.split('.')[1],
|
||
|
sanitize_name(raw_test_name))
|
||
|
|
||
|
subpart_comment = ''
|
||
|
if subpart_number is not None:
|
||
|
sanitized_test_name += "Subpart%d" % (subpart_number)
|
||
|
subpart_comment = ' (Subpart %d)' % (subpart_number)
|
||
|
|
||
|
sanitized_test_names.append(sanitized_test_name)
|
||
|
|
||
|
certs_formatted = ', '.join('"%s"' % n for n in certs)
|
||
|
crls_formatted = ', '.join('"%s"' % n for n in crls)
|
||
|
|
||
|
output.write('''
|
||
|
// %(test_number)s %(raw_test_name)s%(subpart_comment)s
|
||
|
WRAPPED_TYPED_TEST_P(%(test_case_name)s, %(sanitized_test_name)s) {
|
||
|
const char* const certs[] = {
|
||
|
%(certs_formatted)s
|
||
|
};
|
||
|
const char* const crls[] = {
|
||
|
%(crls_formatted)s
|
||
|
};
|
||
|
''' % vars())
|
||
|
|
||
|
default_info = TestInfo(None)
|
||
|
|
||
|
output.write('''PkitsTestInfo info;
|
||
|
info.test_number = "%s";
|
||
|
info.should_validate = %s;
|
||
|
''' % (test_number, bool_to_str(info.should_validate)))
|
||
|
|
||
|
# Output any non-default inputs/outputs. Only properties that differ from
|
||
|
# the defaults are written, so as to keep the generated file more readable.
|
||
|
if info.initial_policy_set != default_info.initial_policy_set:
|
||
|
output.write(''' info.SetInitialPolicySet(%s);
|
||
|
''' % make_policies_string(info.initial_policy_set))
|
||
|
|
||
|
if info.initial_explicit_policy != default_info.initial_explicit_policy:
|
||
|
output.write(''' info.SetInitialExplicitPolicy(%s);
|
||
|
''' % bool_to_str(info.initial_explicit_policy))
|
||
|
|
||
|
if (info.initial_policy_mapping_inhibit !=
|
||
|
default_info.initial_policy_mapping_inhibit):
|
||
|
output.write(''' info.SetInitialPolicyMappingInhibit(%s);
|
||
|
''' % bool_to_str(info.initial_policy_mapping_inhibit))
|
||
|
|
||
|
if (info.initial_inhibit_any_policy !=
|
||
|
default_info.initial_inhibit_any_policy):
|
||
|
output.write(''' info.SetInitialInhibitAnyPolicy(%s);
|
||
|
''' % bool_to_str(info.initial_inhibit_any_policy))
|
||
|
|
||
|
if (info.user_constrained_policy_set !=
|
||
|
default_info.user_constrained_policy_set):
|
||
|
output.write(''' info.SetUserConstrainedPolicySet(%s);
|
||
|
''' % make_policies_string(info.user_constrained_policy_set))
|
||
|
|
||
|
output.write('''
|
||
|
this->RunTest(certs, crls, info);
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
''' % vars())
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
# Matches a section header, ex: "4.1 Signature Verification"
|
||
|
SECTION_MATCHER = re.compile('^\s*(\d+\.\d+)\s+(.+)\s*$')
|
||
|
# Matches a test header, ex: "4.1.1 Valid Signatures Test1"
|
||
|
TEST_MATCHER = re.compile('^\s*(\d+\.\d+.\d+)\s+(.+)\s*$')
|
||
|
|
||
|
# Matches the various headers in a test specification.
|
||
|
EXPECTED_HEADER_MATCHER = re.compile('^\s*Expected Result:')
|
||
|
PROCEDURE_HEADER_MATCHER = re.compile('^\s*Procedure:')
|
||
|
PATH_HEADER_MATCHER = re.compile('^\s*Certification Path:')
|
||
|
|
||
|
# Matches the Procedure text if using default settings.
|
||
|
USING_DEFAULT_SETTINGS_MATCHER = re.compile(
|
||
|
'^.*using the \s*default settings.*')
|
||
|
|
||
|
# Matches the description text if using custom settings.
|
||
|
CUSTOM_SETTINGS_MATCHER = re.compile(
|
||
|
'.*this\s+test\s+be\s+validated\s+using\s+the\s+following\s+inputs:.*')
|
||
|
|
||
|
# Match an expected test result. Note that some results in the PDF have a typo
|
||
|
# "path not should validate" instead of "path should not validate".
|
||
|
TEST_RESULT_MATCHER = re.compile(
|
||
|
'^.*path (should validate|should not validate|not should validate)')
|
||
|
|
||
|
# Matches a line in the certification path, ex:
|
||
|
# "\u2022 Good CA Cert, Good CA CRL"
|
||
|
PATH_MATCHER = re.compile('^\s*\xe2\x80\xa2\s*(.+)\s*$')
|
||
|
# Matches a page number. These may appear in the middle of multi-line fields and
|
||
|
# thus need to be ignored.
|
||
|
PAGE_NUMBER_MATCHER = re.compile('^\s*\d+\s*$')
|
||
|
# Matches if an entry in a certification path refers to a CRL, ex:
|
||
|
# "onlySomeReasons CA2 CRL1".
|
||
|
CRL_MATCHER = re.compile('^.*CRL\d*$')
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
class TestSections(object):
|
||
|
def __init__(self):
|
||
|
self.description_lines = []
|
||
|
self.procedure_lines = []
|
||
|
self.expected_result_lines = []
|
||
|
self.cert_path_lines = []
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
def parse_main_test_sections(lines, i):
|
||
|
result = TestSections()
|
||
|
|
||
|
# Read the description lines (text after test name up until
|
||
|
# "Procedure:").
|
||
|
result.description_lines = []
|
||
|
while i < len(lines):
|
||
|
if PROCEDURE_HEADER_MATCHER.match(lines[i]):
|
||
|
break
|
||
|
result.description_lines.append(lines[i])
|
||
|
i += 1
|
||
|
|
||
|
# Read the procedure lines (text starting at "Procedure:" and up until
|
||
|
# "Expected Result:".
|
||
|
result.procedure_lines = []
|
||
|
while i < len(lines):
|
||
|
if EXPECTED_HEADER_MATCHER.match(lines[i]):
|
||
|
break
|
||
|
result.procedure_lines.append(lines[i])
|
||
|
i += 1
|
||
|
|
||
|
# Read the expected result lines (text starting at "Expected Result:" and up
|
||
|
# until "Certification Path:".
|
||
|
result.expected_result_lines = []
|
||
|
while i < len(lines):
|
||
|
if PATH_HEADER_MATCHER.match(lines[i]):
|
||
|
break
|
||
|
result.expected_result_lines.append(lines[i])
|
||
|
i += 1
|
||
|
|
||
|
# Read the certification path lines (text starting at "Certification Path:"
|
||
|
# and up until the next test title.
|
||
|
result.cert_path_lines = []
|
||
|
while i < len(lines):
|
||
|
if TEST_MATCHER.match(lines[i]) or SECTION_MATCHER.match(lines[i]):
|
||
|
break
|
||
|
result.cert_path_lines.append(lines[i])
|
||
|
i += 1
|
||
|
|
||
|
return i, result
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
def parse_cert_path_lines(lines):
|
||
|
path_lines = []
|
||
|
crls = []
|
||
|
certs = []
|
||
|
|
||
|
for line in lines[1:]:
|
||
|
line = line.strip()
|
||
|
|
||
|
if "is composed of the following objects:" in line:
|
||
|
continue
|
||
|
|
||
|
if not line or PAGE_NUMBER_MATCHER.match(line):
|
||
|
continue
|
||
|
path_match = PATH_MATCHER.match(line)
|
||
|
if path_match:
|
||
|
path_lines.append(path_match.group(1))
|
||
|
continue
|
||
|
# Continuation of previous path line.
|
||
|
path_lines[-1] += ' ' + line
|
||
|
|
||
|
for path_line in path_lines:
|
||
|
for path in path_line.split(','):
|
||
|
path = sanitize_name(path.strip())
|
||
|
if CRL_MATCHER.match(path):
|
||
|
crls.append(path)
|
||
|
else:
|
||
|
certs.append(path)
|
||
|
|
||
|
return certs, crls
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
ANY_POLICY = 'anyPolicy'
|
||
|
TEST_POLICY_1 = 'NIST-test-policy-1'
|
||
|
TEST_POLICY_2 = 'NIST-test-policy-2'
|
||
|
TEST_POLICY_3 = 'NIST-test-policy-3'
|
||
|
TEST_POLICY_6 = 'NIST-test-policy-6'
|
||
|
|
||
|
# Note: This omits some outputs from PKITS:
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# * authorities-constrained-policy-set
|
||
|
# * explicit-policy-indicator
|
||
|
class TestInfo(object):
|
||
|
"""This structure describes a test inputs and outputs"""
|
||
|
|
||
|
def __init__(self, should_validate,
|
||
|
# These defaults come from section 3 of PKITS.pdf
|
||
|
initial_policy_set = [ANY_POLICY],
|
||
|
initial_explicit_policy = False,
|
||
|
initial_policy_mapping_inhibit = False,
|
||
|
initial_inhibit_any_policy = False,
|
||
|
# In all of the tests that are not related to policy processing,
|
||
|
# each certificate in the path asserts the certificate policy
|
||
|
# 2.16.840.1.101.3.2.1.48.1
|
||
|
user_constrained_policy_set = [TEST_POLICY_1]):
|
||
|
self.should_validate = should_validate
|
||
|
self.initial_policy_set = initial_policy_set
|
||
|
self.initial_explicit_policy = initial_explicit_policy
|
||
|
self.initial_policy_mapping_inhibit = initial_policy_mapping_inhibit
|
||
|
self.initial_inhibit_any_policy = initial_inhibit_any_policy
|
||
|
self.user_constrained_policy_set = user_constrained_policy_set
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
TEST_OVERRIDES = {
|
||
|
'4.8.1': [ # All Certificates Same Policy Test1
|
||
|
# 1. default settings, but with initial-explicit-policy set. The path
|
||
|
# should validate successfully
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, initial_explicit_policy=True,
|
||
|
user_constrained_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1]),
|
||
|
|
||
|
# 2. default settings, but with initial-explicit-policy set and
|
||
|
# initial-policy-set = {NIST-test-policy-1}. The path should validate
|
||
|
# successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, initial_explicit_policy=True,
|
||
|
initial_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1],
|
||
|
user_constrained_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1]),
|
||
|
|
||
|
# 3. default settings, but with initial-explicit-policy set and
|
||
|
# initial-policy-set = {NIST-test-policy-2}. The path should not validate
|
||
|
# successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, initial_explicit_policy=True,
|
||
|
initial_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_2],
|
||
|
user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
|
||
|
# 4. default settings, but with initial-explicit-policy set and
|
||
|
# initial-policy-set = {NIST-test-policy-1, NIST-test-policy-2}. The path
|
||
|
# should validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, initial_explicit_policy=True,
|
||
|
initial_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1, TEST_POLICY_2],
|
||
|
user_constrained_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.8.2': [ # All Certificates No Policies Test2
|
||
|
# 1. default settings. The path should validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
|
||
|
# 2. default settings, but with initial-explicit-policy set. The path
|
||
|
# should not validate successfully
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, initial_explicit_policy=True,
|
||
|
user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.8.3': [ # Different Policies Test3
|
||
|
# 1. default settings. The path should validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
|
||
|
# 2. default settings, but with initial-explicit-policy set. The path
|
||
|
# should not validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, initial_explicit_policy=True, user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
|
||
|
# 3. default settings, but with initial-explicit-policy set and
|
||
|
# initial-policy-set = {NIST-test-policy-1, NIST-test-policy-2}. The path
|
||
|
# should not validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, initial_explicit_policy=True,
|
||
|
initial_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1, TEST_POLICY_2],
|
||
|
user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.8.4': [ # Different Policies Test4
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Different Policies Test4 EE using the default
|
||
|
# settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.69 using the
|
||
|
# default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set and the
|
||
|
# user-constrained-policy-set will be empty. The explicit-policy-indicator
|
||
|
# will be set if the application can process the policyConstraints
|
||
|
# extension. If the application can process the policyConstraints extension
|
||
|
# then the path should not validate successfully. If the application can
|
||
|
# not process the policyConstraints extension, then the path should
|
||
|
# validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.8.5': [ # 4.8.5 Different Policies Test5
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Different Policies Test5 EE using the default
|
||
|
# settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.70 using the
|
||
|
# default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set and the
|
||
|
# user-constrained-policy-set will be empty. The explicit-policy-indicator
|
||
|
# will be set if the application can process the policyConstraints
|
||
|
# extension. If the application can process the policyConstraints extension
|
||
|
# then the path should not validate successfully. If the application can
|
||
|
# not process the policyConstraints extension, then the path should
|
||
|
# validate successfully
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.8.6': [ # Overlapping Policies Test6
|
||
|
# 1. default settings. The path should validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, user_constrained_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1]),
|
||
|
|
||
|
# 2. default settings, but with initial-policy-set = {NIST-test-policy-1}.
|
||
|
# The path should validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, initial_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1],
|
||
|
user_constrained_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1]),
|
||
|
|
||
|
# 3. default settings, but with initial-policy-set = {NIST-test-policy-2}.
|
||
|
# The path should not validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, initial_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_2],
|
||
|
user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.8.7': [ # Different Policies Test7
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Different Policies Test7 EE using the default
|
||
|
# settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.72 using the
|
||
|
# default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set and the
|
||
|
# user-constrained-policy-set will be empty. If the
|
||
|
# explicit-policy-indicator will be set if the application can process the
|
||
|
# policyConstraints extension. If the application can process the
|
||
|
# policyConstraints extension, then the path should not validate
|
||
|
# successfully. If the application can not process the policyConstraints
|
||
|
# extension, then the path should validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.8.8': [ # Different Policies Test8
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Different Policies Test8 EE using the default
|
||
|
# settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.73 using the
|
||
|
# default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set and the
|
||
|
# user-constrained-policy-set will be empty. The explicit-policy-indicator
|
||
|
# will be set if the application can process the policyConstraints
|
||
|
# extension. If the application can process the policyConstraints extension
|
||
|
# then the path should not validate successfully. If the application can
|
||
|
# not process the policyConstraints extension, then the path should
|
||
|
# validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.8.9': [ # Different Policies Test9
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Different Policies Test9 EE using the default
|
||
|
# settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.74 using the
|
||
|
# default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set and the
|
||
|
# user-constrained-policy-set will be empty. The explicit-policy-indicator
|
||
|
# will be set if the application can process the policyConstraints
|
||
|
# extension. If the application can process the policyConstraints
|
||
|
# extension, then the path should not validate successfully. If the
|
||
|
# application can not process the policyConstraints extension, then the
|
||
|
# path should validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.8.10': [ # All Certificates Same Policies Test10
|
||
|
# 1. default settings. The path should validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, user_constrained_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1, TEST_POLICY_2]),
|
||
|
|
||
|
# 2. default settings, but with initial-policy-set = {NIST-test-policy-1}.
|
||
|
# The path should validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, initial_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1],
|
||
|
user_constrained_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1]),
|
||
|
|
||
|
# 3. default settings, but with initial-policy-set = {NIST-test-policy-2}.
|
||
|
# The path should validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, initial_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_2],
|
||
|
user_constrained_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_2]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.8.11': [ # All Certificates AnyPolicy Test11
|
||
|
# 1. default settings. The path should validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, user_constrained_policy_set=[ANY_POLICY]),
|
||
|
|
||
|
# 2. default settings, but with initial-policy-set = {NIST-test-policy-1}.
|
||
|
# The path should validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, initial_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1],
|
||
|
user_constrained_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.8.12': [ # Different Policies Test12
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Different Policies Test12 EE using the default
|
||
|
# settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.77 using the
|
||
|
# default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set and the
|
||
|
# user-constrained-policy-set will be empty. The explicit-policy-indicator
|
||
|
# will be set if the application can process the policyConstraints
|
||
|
# extension. If the application can process the policyConstraints
|
||
|
# extension, then the path should not validate successfully. If the
|
||
|
# application can not process the policyConstraints extension, then the
|
||
|
# path should validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.8.13': [ # All Certificates Same Policies Test13
|
||
|
# 1. default settings, but with initial-policy-set = {NIST-test-policy-1}.
|
||
|
# The path should validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, initial_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1],
|
||
|
user_constrained_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1]),
|
||
|
|
||
|
# 2. default settings, but with initial-policy-set = {NIST-test-policy-2}.
|
||
|
# The path should validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, initial_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_2],
|
||
|
user_constrained_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_2]),
|
||
|
|
||
|
# 3. default settings, but with initial-policy-set = {NIST-test-policy-3}.
|
||
|
# The path should validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, initial_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_3],
|
||
|
user_constrained_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_3]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.8.14': [ # AnyPolicy Test14
|
||
|
# 1. default settings, but with initial-policy-set = {NIST-test-policy-1}.
|
||
|
# The path should validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, initial_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1],
|
||
|
user_constrained_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1]),
|
||
|
|
||
|
# 2. default settings, but with initial-policy-set = {NIST-test-policy-2}.
|
||
|
# The path should not validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, initial_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_2],
|
||
|
user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.8.15': [ # User Notice Qualifier Test15
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate User Notice Qualifier Test15 EE using the default
|
||
|
# settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.80 using the
|
||
|
# default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set will be
|
||
|
# {NIST-test-policy-1} and the explicit-policy-indicator will be the same
|
||
|
# as the initial-explicit-policy indicator. If the initial-policy-set is
|
||
|
# any-policy or otherwise includes NIST-test-policy-1, then the
|
||
|
# user-constrained-policy-set will be {NIST-test-policy-1}. If not, the
|
||
|
# user-constrained-policy-set will be empty. If the initial-explicit-policy
|
||
|
# indicator is set and the initial-policy-set does not include
|
||
|
# NIST-test-policy-1, then the path should be rejected, otherwise it should
|
||
|
# validate successfully. If the path validates successfully, then the
|
||
|
# application should display the user notice.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, user_constrained_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.8.16': [ # User Notice Qualifier Test16
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate User Notice Qualifier Test16 EE using the default
|
||
|
# settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.81 using the
|
||
|
# default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set will be
|
||
|
# {NIST-test-policy-1} and the explicit-policy-indicator will be the same
|
||
|
# as the initial-explicit-policy indicator. If the initial-policy-set is
|
||
|
# any-policy or otherwise includes NIST-test-policy-1, then the
|
||
|
# user-constrained-policy-set will be {NIST-test-policy-1}. If not, the
|
||
|
# user-constrained-policy-set will be empty. If the initial-explicit-policy
|
||
|
# indicator is set and the initial-policy-set does not include
|
||
|
# NIST-test-policy-1, then the path should be rejected, otherwise it should
|
||
|
# validate successfully. If the path validates successfully, then the
|
||
|
# application should display the user notice associated with
|
||
|
# NIST-test-policy-1. The user notice associated with NIST-test-policy-2
|
||
|
# should not be displayed.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, user_constrained_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.8.17': [ # User Notice Qualifier Test17
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate User Notice Qualifier Test17 EE using the default
|
||
|
# settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.82 using the
|
||
|
# default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set will be
|
||
|
# {NIST-test-policy-1} and the explicit-policy-indicator will be the same
|
||
|
# as the initial-explicit-policy indicator. If the initial-policy-set is
|
||
|
# any-policy or otherwise includes NIST-test-policy-1, then the
|
||
|
# user-constrained-policy-set will be {NIST-test-policy-1}. If not, the
|
||
|
# user-constrained-policy-set will be empty. If the initial-explicit-policy
|
||
|
# indicator is set and the initial-policy-set does not include
|
||
|
# NIST-test-policy-1, then the path should be rejected, otherwise it should
|
||
|
# validate successfully. If the path validates successfully, then the
|
||
|
# application should display the user notice associated with anyPolicy.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, user_constrained_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.8.18': [ # User Notice Qualifier Test18
|
||
|
# 1. default settings, but with initial-policy-set = {NIST-test-policy-1}.
|
||
|
# The path should validate successfully and the qualifier associated with
|
||
|
# NIST-test-policy-1 in the end entity certificate should be displayed.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, initial_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1],
|
||
|
user_constrained_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1]),
|
||
|
|
||
|
# 2. default settings, but with initial-policy-set = {NIST-test-policy-2}.
|
||
|
# The path should validate successfully and the qualifier associated with
|
||
|
# anyPolicy in the end entity certificate should be displayed.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, initial_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_2],
|
||
|
user_constrained_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_2]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.8.19': [ # User Notice Qualifier Test19
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate User Notice Qualifier Test19 EE using the default
|
||
|
# settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.84 using the
|
||
|
# default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set will be
|
||
|
# {NIST-test-policy-1} and the explicit-policy-indicator will be the same
|
||
|
# as the initial-explicit-policy indicator. If the initial-policy-set is
|
||
|
# any-policy or otherwise includes NIST-test-policy-1, then the
|
||
|
# user-constrained-policy-set will be {NIST-test-policy-1}. If not, the
|
||
|
# user-constrained-policy-set will be empty. If the initial-explicit-policy
|
||
|
# indicator is set and the initial-policy-set does not include
|
||
|
# NIST-test-policy-1, then the path should be rejected, otherwise it should
|
||
|
# validate successfully. Since the explicitText exceeds the maximum size
|
||
|
# of 200 characters, the application may choose to reject the certificate.
|
||
|
# If the application accepts the certificate, display of the user notice is
|
||
|
# optional.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, user_constrained_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.8.20': [ # CPS Pointer Qualifier Test20
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate CPS Pointer Qualifier Test20 EE using the default
|
||
|
# settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.85 using the
|
||
|
# default settings. (If possible, it is recommended that this test be run
|
||
|
# with the initial-explicit-policy indicator set. If this can not be done,
|
||
|
# manually check that the authorities-constrained-policy-set and
|
||
|
# user-constrained-policy-set are correct.)
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set will be
|
||
|
# {NIST-test-policy-1} and the explicit-policy-indicator will be the same
|
||
|
# as the initial-explicit-policy indicator. If the initial-policy-set is
|
||
|
# any-policy or otherwise includes NIST-test-policy-1, then the
|
||
|
# user-constrained-policy-set will be {NIST-test-policy-1}. If not, the
|
||
|
# user-constrained-policy-set will be empty. If the initial-explicit-policy
|
||
|
# indicator is set and the initial-policy-set does not include
|
||
|
# NIST-test-policy-1, then the path should be rejected, otherwise it should
|
||
|
# validate successfully. The CPS pointer in the qualifier should be
|
||
|
# associated with NIST-testpolicy-1 in the
|
||
|
# authorities-constrained-policy-set (and in the user-constrained-policy-set
|
||
|
# if NIST-test-policy-1 is in that set). There are no processing
|
||
|
# requirements associated with the CPS pointer qualifier.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, initial_explicit_policy=True,
|
||
|
initial_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1],
|
||
|
user_constrained_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.9.1': [ # Valid RequireExplicitPolicy Test1
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Valid requireExplicitPolicy Test1 EE using the
|
||
|
# default settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.86 using
|
||
|
# the default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The path should validate successfully since the
|
||
|
# explicit-policy-indicator is not set.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.9.2': [ # Valid RequireExplicitPolicy Test2
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Valid requireExplicitPolicy Test2 EE using the
|
||
|
# default settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.87 using
|
||
|
# the default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The path should validate successfully since the
|
||
|
# explicit-policy-indicator is not set
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.9.6': [ # Valid Self-Issued requireExplicitPolicy Test6
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Valid Self-Issued requireExplicitPolicy Test6 EE using
|
||
|
# the default settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.91 using
|
||
|
# the default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The path should validate successfully since the
|
||
|
# explicit-policy-indicator is not set.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.10.1': [ # Valid Policy Mapping Test1
|
||
|
# 1. default settings, but with initial-policy-set = {NIST-test-policy-1}.
|
||
|
# The path should validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, initial_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1],
|
||
|
user_constrained_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1]),
|
||
|
|
||
|
# 2. default settings, but with initial-policy-set = {NIST-test-policy-2}.
|
||
|
# The path should not validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, initial_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_2],
|
||
|
user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
|
||
|
# 3. default settings, but with initial-policy-mapping-inhibit set. The
|
||
|
# path should not validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, initial_policy_mapping_inhibit=True,
|
||
|
user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.10.2': [ # Invalid Policy Mapping Test2
|
||
|
# 1. default settings. The path should not validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
|
||
|
# 2. default settings, but with initial-policy-mapping-inhibit set. The
|
||
|
# path should not validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, initial_policy_mapping_inhibit=True,
|
||
|
user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.10.3': [ # Valid Policy Mapping Test3
|
||
|
# 1. default settings, but with initial-policy-set = {NIST-test-policy-1}.
|
||
|
# The path should not validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, initial_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1],
|
||
|
user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
|
||
|
# 2. default settings, but with initial-policy-set = {NIST-test-policy-2}.
|
||
|
# The path should validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, initial_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_2],
|
||
|
user_constrained_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_2]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.10.4': [ # Invalid Policy Mapping Test4
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Invalid Policy Mapping Test4 EE using the default
|
||
|
# settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.97 using the
|
||
|
# default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set and the
|
||
|
# user-constrained-policy-set will be empty and the
|
||
|
# explicit-policy-indicator will be set (if the application can process the
|
||
|
# policyConstraints extension). If the application can process the
|
||
|
# policyConstraints extension, then the path should be rejected, otherwise
|
||
|
# it should validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.10.5': [ # Valid Policy Mapping Test5
|
||
|
# 1. default settings, but with initial-policy-set = {NIST-test-policy-1}.
|
||
|
# The path should validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, initial_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1],
|
||
|
user_constrained_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1]),
|
||
|
|
||
|
# 2. default settings, but with initial-policy-set = {NIST-test-policy-6}.
|
||
|
# The path should not validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, initial_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_6],
|
||
|
user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.10.6': [ # Valid Policy Mapping Test6
|
||
|
# 1. default settings, but with initial-policy-set = {NIST-test-policy-1}.
|
||
|
# The path should validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, initial_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1],
|
||
|
user_constrained_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1]),
|
||
|
|
||
|
# 2. default settings, but with initial-policy-set = {NIST-test-policy-6}.
|
||
|
# The path should not validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, initial_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_6],
|
||
|
user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.10.7': [ # Invalid Mapping From anyPolicy Test7
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Invalid Mapping From anyPolicy Test7 EE using the
|
||
|
# default settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.100 using
|
||
|
# the default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The path should not validate successfully since the
|
||
|
# intermediate certificate includes a policy mapping extension in which
|
||
|
# anyPolicy appears as an issuerDomainPolicy.
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.10.8': [ # Invalid Mapping To anyPolicy Test8
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Invalid Mapping To anyPolicy Test8 EE using the
|
||
|
# default settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.101 using
|
||
|
# the default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The path should not validate successfully since the
|
||
|
# intermediate certificate includes a policy mapping extension in which
|
||
|
# anyPolicy appears as an subjectDomainPolicy.
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.10.9': [ # Valid Policy Mapping Test9
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Valid Policy Mapping Test9 EE using the default
|
||
|
# settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.102 using the
|
||
|
# default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set will be
|
||
|
# {NIST-test-policy-1} and the explicit-policy-indicator will be set (if
|
||
|
# the application can process the policyConstraints extension). If the
|
||
|
# initial-policy-set is any-policy or otherwise includes
|
||
|
# NIST-test-policy-1, then the user-constrained-policy-set will be
|
||
|
# {NIST-test-policy-1}. If not, the user-constrained-policy-set will be
|
||
|
# empty. If the initial-policy-set does not include NIST-test-policy-1 (and
|
||
|
# the application can process the policyConstraints extension), then the
|
||
|
# path should be rejected, otherwise it should validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.10.10': [ # Invalid Policy Mapping Test10
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Invalid Policy Mapping Test10 EE using the default
|
||
|
# settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.103 using the
|
||
|
# default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set and the
|
||
|
# user-constrained-policy-set will be empty and the
|
||
|
# explicit-policy-indicator will be set (if the application can process the
|
||
|
# policyConstraints extension). If the application can process the
|
||
|
# policyConstraints extension, then the path should be rejected, otherwise
|
||
|
# it should validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.10.11': [ # Valid Policy Mapping Test11
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Valid Policy Mapping Test11 EE using the default
|
||
|
# settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.104 using the
|
||
|
# default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set will be
|
||
|
# {NIST-test-policy-1} and the explicit-policy-indicator will be set (if
|
||
|
# the application can process the policyConstraints extension). If the
|
||
|
# initial-policy-set is any-policy or otherwise includes
|
||
|
# NIST-test-policy-1, then the user-constrained-policy-set will be
|
||
|
# {NIST-test-policy-1}. If not, the user-constrained-policy-set will be
|
||
|
# empty. If the initial-policy-set does not include NIST-test-policy-1 (and
|
||
|
# the application can process the policyConstraints extension), then the
|
||
|
# path should be rejected, otherwise it should validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, user_constrained_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.10.12': [ # Valid Policy Mapping Test12
|
||
|
# 1. default settings, but with initial-policy-set = {NIST-test-policy-1}.
|
||
|
# The path should validate successfully and the application should display
|
||
|
# the user notice associated with NIST-test-policy-3 in the end entity
|
||
|
# certificate.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, initial_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1],
|
||
|
user_constrained_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1]),
|
||
|
|
||
|
# 2. default settings, but with initial-policy-set = {NIST-test-policy-2}.
|
||
|
# The path should validate successfully and the application should display
|
||
|
# the user notice associated with anyPolicy in the end entity certificate.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, initial_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_2],
|
||
|
user_constrained_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_2]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.10.13': [ # Valid Policy Mapping Test13
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Valid Policy Mapping Test13 EE using the default
|
||
|
# settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.106 using the
|
||
|
# default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set will be
|
||
|
# {NIST-test-policy-1} and the explicit-policy-indicator will be set (if
|
||
|
# the application can process the policyConstraints extension). If the
|
||
|
# initial-policy-set is any-policy or otherwise includes
|
||
|
# NIST-test-policy-1, then the user-constrained-policy-set will be
|
||
|
# {NIST-test-policy-1}. If not, the user-constrained-policy-set will be
|
||
|
# empty. If the initial-policy-set does not include NIST-test-policy-1 (and
|
||
|
# the application can process the policyConstraints extension), then the
|
||
|
# path should be rejected, otherwise it should validate successfully. If
|
||
|
# the path is accepted, the application should display the user notice
|
||
|
# associated with NIST-testpolicy-1 in the intermediate certificate.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, user_constrained_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.10.14': [ # Valid Policy Mapping Test14
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Valid Policy Mapping Test14 EE using the default
|
||
|
# settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.107 using the
|
||
|
# default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set will be
|
||
|
# {NIST-test-policy-1} and the explicit-policy-indicator will be set (if
|
||
|
# the application can process the policyConstraints extension). If the
|
||
|
# initial-policy-set is any-policy or otherwise includes
|
||
|
# NIST-test-policy-1, then the user-constrained-policy-set will be
|
||
|
# {NIST-test-policy-1}. If not, the user-constrained-policy-set will be
|
||
|
# empty. If the initial-policy-set does not include NIST-test-policy-1 (and
|
||
|
# the application can process the policyConstraints extension), then the
|
||
|
# path should be rejected, otherwise it should validate successfully. If
|
||
|
# the path is accepted, the application should display the user notice
|
||
|
# associated with anyPolicy in the intermediate certificate
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, user_constrained_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.11.1': [ # Invalid inhibitPolicyMapping Test1
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Invalid inhibitPolicyMapping Test1 EE using the
|
||
|
# default settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.108 using
|
||
|
# the default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set and the
|
||
|
# user-constrained-policy-set will be empty. The explicit-policy-indicator
|
||
|
# will be set. The path should not validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.11.2': [ # Valid inhibitPolicyMapping Test2
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Valid inhibitPolicyMapping Test2 EE using the default
|
||
|
# settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.109 using the
|
||
|
# default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set will be
|
||
|
# {NIST-test-policy-1} and the explicit-policy-indicator will be set. If
|
||
|
# the initial-policy-set is any-policy or otherwise includes
|
||
|
# NIST-test-policy-1, then the path should validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, user_constrained_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.11.3': [ # Invalid inhibitPolicyMapping Test3
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Invalid inhibitPolicyMapping Test3 EE using the
|
||
|
# default settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.110 using
|
||
|
# the default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set and the
|
||
|
# user-constrained-policy-set will be empty and the
|
||
|
# explicit-policy-indicator will be set. The path should not validate
|
||
|
# successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.11.4': [ # Valid inhibitPolicyMapping Test4
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Valid inhibitPolicyMapping Test4 EE using the default
|
||
|
# settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.111 using the
|
||
|
# default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set will be
|
||
|
# {NIST-test-policy-2} and the explicit-policy-indicator will be set. If
|
||
|
# the initial-policy-set is any-policy or otherwise includes
|
||
|
# NIST-test-policy-2, then the path should validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, user_constrained_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_2]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.11.5': [ # Invalid inhibitPolicyMapping Test5
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Invalid inhibitPolicyMapping Test5 EE using the
|
||
|
# default settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.112 using
|
||
|
# the default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set and the
|
||
|
# user-constrained-policy-set will be empty and the
|
||
|
# explicit-policy-indicator will be set. The path should not validate
|
||
|
# successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.11.6': [ # Invalid inhibitPolicyMapping Test6
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Invalid inhibitPolicyMapping Test6 EE using the
|
||
|
# default settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.113 using
|
||
|
# the default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set and the
|
||
|
# user-constrained-policy-set will be empty and the
|
||
|
# explicit-policy-indicator will be set. The path should not validate
|
||
|
# successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.11.7': [ # Valid Self-Issued inhibitPolicyMapping Test7
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Valid Self-Issued inhibitPolicyMapping Test7 EE using
|
||
|
# the default settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.114
|
||
|
# using the default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set will be
|
||
|
# {NIST-test-policy-1} and the explicit-policy-indicator will be set. If
|
||
|
# the initial-policy-set is any-policy or otherwise includes
|
||
|
# NIST-test-policy-1, then the path should validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, user_constrained_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.11.8': [ # Invalid Self-Issued inhibitPolicyMapping Test8
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Invalid Self-Issued inhibitPolicyMapping Test8 EE
|
||
|
# using the default settings or open and verify Signed Test Message
|
||
|
# 6.2.2.115 using the default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set and
|
||
|
# user-constrained-policy-set will be empty and the
|
||
|
# explicit-policy-indicator will be set. The path should not validate
|
||
|
# successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.11.9': [ # Invalid Self-Issued inhibitPolicyMapping Test9
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Invalid Self-Issued inhibitPolicyMapping Test9 EE
|
||
|
# using the default settings or open and verify Signed Test Message
|
||
|
# 6.2.2.116 using the default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set and
|
||
|
# user-constrained-policy-set will be empty and the
|
||
|
# explicit-policy-indicator will be set. The path should not validate
|
||
|
# successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.11.10': [ # Invalid Self-Issued inhibitPolicyMapping Test10
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Invalid Self-Issued inhibitPolicyMapping Test10 EE
|
||
|
# using the default settings or open and verify Signed Test Message
|
||
|
# 6.2.2.117 using the default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set and
|
||
|
# user-constrained-policy-set will be empty and the
|
||
|
# explicit-policy-indicator will be set. The path should not validate
|
||
|
# successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.11.11': [ # Invalid Self-Issued inhibitPolicyMapping Test11
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Invalid Self-Issued inhibitPolicyMapping Test11 EE
|
||
|
# using the default settings or open and verify Signed Test Message
|
||
|
# 6.2.2.118 using the default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set and
|
||
|
# user-constrained-policy-set will be empty and the
|
||
|
# explicit-policy-indicator will be set. The path should not validate
|
||
|
# successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.12.1': [ # Invalid inhibitAnyPolicy Test1
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Invalid inhibitAnyPolicy Test1 EE using the default
|
||
|
# settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.119 using the
|
||
|
# default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set and
|
||
|
# user-constrained-policy-set will be empty and the
|
||
|
# explicit-policy-indicator will be set (if the application can process the
|
||
|
# policyConstraints extension). If the application can process the
|
||
|
# policyConstraints extension, then the path should not validate
|
||
|
# successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.12.2': [ # Valid inhibitAnyPolicy Test2
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Valid inhibitAnyPolicy Test2 EE using the default
|
||
|
# settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.120 using the
|
||
|
# default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set will be
|
||
|
# {NIST-test-policy-1} and the explicit-policy-indicator will be set (if
|
||
|
# the application can process the policyConstraints extension). If the
|
||
|
# initial-policy-set is any-policy or otherwise includes
|
||
|
# NIST-test-policy-1, then the user-constrained-policy-set will be
|
||
|
# {NIST-test-policy-1} and the path should validate successfully. If not,
|
||
|
# then the user-constrained-policy-set will be empty. If the
|
||
|
# user-constrained-policy-set is empty and the application can process the
|
||
|
# policyConstraints extension, then the path should not validate
|
||
|
# successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, user_constrained_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.12.3': [ # inhibitAnyPolicy Test3
|
||
|
# 1. default settings. The path should validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, user_constrained_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1]),
|
||
|
|
||
|
# 2. default settings, but with initial-inhibit-any-policy set. The path
|
||
|
# should not validate successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, initial_inhibit_any_policy=True,
|
||
|
user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.12.4': [ # Invalid inhibitAnyPolicy Test4
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Invalid inhibitAnyPolicy Test4 EE using the default
|
||
|
# settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.122 using the
|
||
|
# default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set and
|
||
|
# user-constrained-policy-set will be empty and the
|
||
|
# explicit-policy-indicator will be set (if the application can process the
|
||
|
# policyConstraints extension). If the application can process the
|
||
|
# policyConstraints extension, then the path should not validate
|
||
|
# successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.12.5': [ # Invalid inhibitAnyPolicy Test5
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Invalid inhibitAnyPolicy Test5 EE using the default
|
||
|
# settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.123 using the
|
||
|
# default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set and
|
||
|
# user-constrained-policy-set will be empty and the
|
||
|
# explicit-policy-indicator will be set (if the application can process the
|
||
|
# policyConstraints extension). If the application can process the
|
||
|
# policyConstraints extension, then the path should not validate
|
||
|
# successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.12.6': [ # Invalid inhibitAnyPolicy Test6
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Invalid inhibitAnyPolicy Test6 EE using the default
|
||
|
# settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.124 using the
|
||
|
# default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set and
|
||
|
# user-constrained-policy-set will be empty and the
|
||
|
# explicit-policy-indicator will be set (if the application can process the
|
||
|
# policyConstraints extension). If the application can process the
|
||
|
# policyConstraints extension, then the path should not validate
|
||
|
# successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.12.7': [ # Valid Self-Issued inhibitAnyPolicy Test7
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Valid Self-Issued inhibitAnyPolicy Test7 EE using the
|
||
|
# default settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.125 using
|
||
|
# the default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set will be
|
||
|
# {NIST-test-policy-1} and the explicit-policy-indicator will be set (if
|
||
|
# the application can process the policyConstraints extension). If the
|
||
|
# initial-policy-set is any-policy or otherwise includes
|
||
|
# NIST-test-policy-1, then the user-constrained-policy-set will be
|
||
|
# {NIST-test-policy-1} and the path should validate successfully. If not,
|
||
|
# then the user-constrained-policy-set will be empty. If the
|
||
|
# user-constrained-policy-set is empty and the application can process the
|
||
|
# policyConstraints extension, then the path should not validate
|
||
|
# successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, user_constrained_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.12.8': [ # Invalid Self-Issued inhibitAnyPolicy Test8
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Invalid Self-Issued inhibitAnyPolicy Test8 EE using
|
||
|
# the default settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.126
|
||
|
# using the default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set and
|
||
|
# user-constrained-policy-set will be empty and the
|
||
|
# explicit-policy-indicator will be set (if the application can process the
|
||
|
# policyConstraints extension). If the application can process the
|
||
|
# policyConstraints extension, then the path should not validate
|
||
|
# successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.12.9': [ # Valid Self-Issued inhibitAnyPolicy Test9
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Valid Self-Issued inhibitAnyPolicy Test9 EE using the
|
||
|
# default settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.127 using
|
||
|
# the default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set will be
|
||
|
# {NIST-test-policy-1} and the explicit-policy-indicator will be set (if
|
||
|
# the application can process the policyConstraints extension). If the
|
||
|
# initial-policy-set is any-policy or otherwise includes
|
||
|
# NIST-test-policy-1, then the user-constrained-policy-set will be
|
||
|
# {NIST-test-policy-1} and the path should validate successfully. If not,
|
||
|
# then the user-constrained-policy-set will be empty. If the
|
||
|
# user-constrained-policy-set is empty and the application can process the
|
||
|
# policyConstraints extension, then the path should not validate
|
||
|
# successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(True, user_constrained_policy_set=[TEST_POLICY_1]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
|
||
|
'4.12.10': [ # Invalid Self-Issued inhibitAnyPolicy Test10
|
||
|
# Procedure: Validate Invalid Self-Issued inhibitAnyPolicy Test10 EE using
|
||
|
# the default settings or open and verify Signed Test Message 6.2.2.128
|
||
|
# using the default settings.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# Expected Result: The authorities-constrained-policy-set and
|
||
|
# user-constrained-policy-set will be empty and the
|
||
|
# explicit-policy-indicator will be set (if the application can process the
|
||
|
# policyConstraints extension). If the application can process the
|
||
|
# policyConstraints extension, then the path should not validate
|
||
|
# successfully.
|
||
|
TestInfo(False, user_constrained_policy_set=[]),
|
||
|
],
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
def parse_test(lines, i, test_case_name, test_number, test_name,
|
||
|
sanitized_test_names, output):
|
||
|
# Start by doing a coarse level of parsing that separates out the lines for
|
||
|
# the main sections.
|
||
|
i, test_sections = parse_main_test_sections(lines, i)
|
||
|
|
||
|
certs, crls = parse_cert_path_lines(test_sections.cert_path_lines)
|
||
|
|
||
|
# Most tests have a formulaic specification: they use the default
|
||
|
# settings, and have one expectation. These are easily parsed and are handled
|
||
|
# programmatically. In contrast, many of the policies tests have a more
|
||
|
# complicated specification which involves multiple subtests having various
|
||
|
# settings, as well as expectations described in terms of supported
|
||
|
# extensions. Rather than try to handle all the nuanced language, these are
|
||
|
# handled manually via "overrides".
|
||
|
overrides = TEST_OVERRIDES.get(test_number, None)
|
||
|
|
||
|
if overrides is None:
|
||
|
# Verify that the test description doesn't include numbered subparts (those
|
||
|
# are not handled here).
|
||
|
if CUSTOM_SETTINGS_MATCHER.match(" ".join(test_sections.description_lines)):
|
||
|
sys.stderr.write('Unexpected custom settings for %s\n' % test_number)
|
||
|
sys.exit(1)
|
||
|
|
||
|
# Verify that the test is using only default settings.
|
||
|
if not USING_DEFAULT_SETTINGS_MATCHER.match(
|
||
|
" ".join(test_sections.procedure_lines)):
|
||
|
sys.stderr.write('Unexpected procedure for %s: %s\n' %
|
||
|
(test_number, " ".join(test_section.procedure_lines)))
|
||
|
sys.exit(1)
|
||
|
|
||
|
# Check whether expected result is validation success or failure.
|
||
|
result_match = TEST_RESULT_MATCHER.match(
|
||
|
test_sections.expected_result_lines[0])
|
||
|
if not result_match:
|
||
|
sys.stderr.write('Unknown expectation for %s:\n%s\n' % (
|
||
|
test_number, " ".join(test_sections.expected_result_lines)))
|
||
|
sys.exit(1)
|
||
|
# Initializes with default settings.
|
||
|
info = TestInfo(result_match.group(1) == 'should validate')
|
||
|
|
||
|
# Special case the 4.9 test failures (require explicit policy) to set
|
||
|
# user_constrained_policy_set to empty. This is only done for the 4.9
|
||
|
# tests, because the other policy tests are special cased as overrides and
|
||
|
# hence set this manually on a per-test basis.
|
||
|
#
|
||
|
# user_constrained_policy_set enumerates the subset of the initial policy
|
||
|
# set (anyPolicy in the default case) that were valid for the path. For
|
||
|
# non-policy tests the expectation for user_constrained_policy_set is
|
||
|
# [TEST_POLICY_1] since each policy asserts that. However for these tests,
|
||
|
# the expectation is an empty user_constrained_policy_set since there was
|
||
|
# no valid policy for the path (in fact, that is why the path validation is
|
||
|
# expected to fail).
|
||
|
if test_number.startswith('4.9.') and not info.should_validate:
|
||
|
info.user_constrained_policy_set = []
|
||
|
|
||
|
output_test(test_case_name, test_number, test_name, None, info, certs,
|
||
|
crls, sanitized_test_names, output)
|
||
|
else:
|
||
|
# The overrides may have a series of inputs (settings) and outputs
|
||
|
# (success/failure) for this test. Output each as a separate test case.
|
||
|
for subpart_i in range(len(overrides)):
|
||
|
info = overrides[subpart_i]
|
||
|
# If the test has only 1 subpart, don't number it.
|
||
|
subpart_number = subpart_i + 1 if len(overrides) > 1 else None
|
||
|
output_test(test_case_name, test_number, test_name, subpart_number, info,
|
||
|
certs, crls, sanitized_test_names, output)
|
||
|
|
||
|
return i
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
def main():
|
||
|
pkits_pdf_path, output_path = sys.argv[1:]
|
||
|
|
||
|
pkits_txt_file = tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile()
|
||
|
|
||
|
subprocess.check_call(['pdftotext', '-layout', '-nopgbrk', '-eol', 'unix',
|
||
|
pkits_pdf_path, pkits_txt_file.name])
|
||
|
|
||
|
test_descriptions = pkits_txt_file.read()
|
||
|
|
||
|
# Extract section 4 of the text, which is the part that contains the tests.
|
||
|
test_descriptions = test_descriptions.split(
|
||
|
'4 Certification Path Validation Tests')[-1]
|
||
|
test_descriptions = test_descriptions.split(
|
||
|
'5 Relationship to Previous Test Suite', 1)[0]
|
||
|
|
||
|
output = open(output_path, 'w')
|
||
|
output.write('// Autogenerated by %s, do not edit\n\n' % sys.argv[0])
|
||
|
output.write('// Hack to allow disabling type parameterized test cases.\n'
|
||
|
'// See https://github.com/google/googletest/issues/389\n')
|
||
|
output.write('#define WRAPPED_TYPED_TEST_P(CaseName, TestName) '
|
||
|
'TYPED_TEST_P(CaseName, TestName)\n')
|
||
|
output.write('#define WRAPPED_REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(CaseName, ...) '
|
||
|
'REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(CaseName, __VA_ARGS__)\n\n')
|
||
|
|
||
|
test_case_name = None
|
||
|
sanitized_test_names = []
|
||
|
|
||
|
lines = test_descriptions.splitlines()
|
||
|
|
||
|
i = 0
|
||
|
while i < len(lines):
|
||
|
section_match = SECTION_MATCHER.match(lines[i])
|
||
|
match = TEST_MATCHER.match(lines[i])
|
||
|
i += 1
|
||
|
|
||
|
if section_match:
|
||
|
if test_case_name:
|
||
|
finalize_test_case(test_case_name, sanitized_test_names, output)
|
||
|
sanitized_test_names = []
|
||
|
|
||
|
test_case_name = 'PkitsTest%02d%s' % (
|
||
|
int(section_match.group(1).split('.')[-1]),
|
||
|
sanitize_name(section_match.group(2)))
|
||
|
output.write('\ntemplate <typename PkitsTestDelegate>\n')
|
||
|
output.write('class %s : public PkitsTest<PkitsTestDelegate> {};\n' %
|
||
|
test_case_name)
|
||
|
output.write('TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(%s);\n' % test_case_name)
|
||
|
|
||
|
if match:
|
||
|
test_number = match.group(1)
|
||
|
test_name = match.group(2)
|
||
|
if not test_case_name:
|
||
|
output.write('// Skipped %s %s\n' % (test_number, test_name))
|
||
|
continue
|
||
|
i, parse_test(lines, i, test_case_name, test_number,
|
||
|
test_name, sanitized_test_names, output)
|
||
|
|
||
|
if test_case_name:
|
||
|
finalize_test_case(test_case_name, sanitized_test_names, output)
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
||
|
main()
|