1
0
mirror of synced 2024-12-14 23:26:04 +03:00
doctrine2/vendor/simpletest/docs/en/index.html
2007-01-28 22:39:21 +00:00

468 lines
17 KiB
HTML

<html>
<head>
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<title>
Download the Simple Test testing framework -
Unit tests and mock objects for PHP
</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="docs.css" title="Styles">
</head>
<body>
<div class="menu_back">
<div class="menu">
<h2>
<span class="chosen">SimpleTest</span>
</h2>
<ul>
<li>
<a href="overview.html">Overview</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="unit_test_documentation.html">Unit tester</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="group_test_documentation.html">Group tests</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="server_stubs_documentation.html">Server stubs</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="mock_objects_documentation.html">Mock objects</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="partial_mocks_documentation.html">Partial mocks</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="reporter_documentation.html">Reporting</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="expectation_documentation.html">Expectations</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="web_tester_documentation.html">Web tester</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="form_testing_documentation.html">Testing forms</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="authentication_documentation.html">Authentication</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="browser_documentation.html">Scriptable browser</a>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<h1>Simple Test for PHP</h1>
<div class="content">
<p>
The following assumes that you are familiar with the concept
of unit testing as well as the PHP web development language.
It is a guide for the impatient new user of
<a href="https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=76550">SimpleTest</a>.
For fuller documentation, especially if you are new
to unit testing see the ongoing
<a href="unit_test_documentation.html">documentation</a>, and for
example test cases see the
<a href="http://www.lastcraft.com/first_test_tutorial.php">unit testing tutorial</a>.
</p>
<p>
<a class="target" name="unit">
<h2>Using the tester quickly</h2>
</a>
</p>
<p>
Amongst software testing tools, a unit tester is the one
closest to the developer.
In the context of agile development the test code sits right
next to the source code as both are written simultaneously.
In this context SimpleTest aims to be a complete PHP developer
test solution and is called "Simple" because it
should be easy to use and extend.
It wasn't a good choice of name really.
It includes all of the typical functions you would expect from
<a href="http://www.junit.org/">JUnit</a> and the
<a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/phpunit/">PHPUnit</a>
ports, but also adds
<a href="http://www.mockobjects.com">mock objects</a>.
It has some <a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/jwebunit/">JWebUnit</a>
functionality as well.
This includes web page navigation, cookie testing and form submission.
</p>
<p>
The quickest way to demonstrate is with an example.
</p>
<p>
Let us suppose we are testing a simple file logging class called
<span class="new_code">Log</span> in <em>classes/log.php</em>.
We start by creating a test script which we will call
<em>tests/log_test.php</em> and populate it as follows...
<pre>
<strong>&lt;?php
require_once('simpletest/unit_tester.php');
require_once('simpletest/reporter.php');
require_once('../classes/log.php');
?&gt;</strong>
</pre>
Here the <em>simpletest</em> folder is either local or in the path.
You would have to edit these locations depending on where you
placed the toolset.
Next we create a test case...
<pre>
&lt;?php
require_once('simpletest/unit_tester.php');
require_once('simpletest/reporter.php');
require_once('../classes/log.php');
<strong>
class TestOfLogging extends UnitTestCase {
}</strong>
?&gt;
</pre>
Now we have five lines of scaffolding code and still no tests.
However from this part on we get return on our investment very quickly.
We'll assume that the <span class="new_code">Log</span> class
takes the file name to write to in the constructor and we have
a temporary folder in which to place this file...
<pre>
&lt;?php
require_once('simpletest/unit_tester.php');
require_once('simpletest/reporter.php');
require_once('../classes/log.php');
class TestOfLogging extends UnitTestCase {
<strong>
function testCreatingNewFile() {
@unlink('/temp/test.log');
$log = new Log('/temp/test.log');
$this-&gt;assertFalse(file_exists('/temp/test.log'));
$log-&gt;message('Should write this to a file');
$this-&gt;assertTrue(file_exists('/temp/test.log'));
}</strong>
}
?&gt;
</pre>
When a test case runs it will search for any method that
starts with the string <span class="new_code">test</span>
and execute that method.
We would normally have more than one test method of course.
Assertions within the test methods trigger messages to the
test framework which displays the result immediately.
This immediate response is important, not just in the event
of the code causing a crash, but also so that
<span class="new_code">print</span> statements can display
their content right next to the test case concerned.
</p>
<p>
To see these results we have to actually run the tests.
If this is the only test case we wish to run we can achieve
it with...
<pre>
&lt;?php
require_once('simpletest/unit_tester.php');
require_once('simpletest/reporter.php');
require_once('../classes/log.php');
class TestOfLogging extends UnitTestCase {
function testCreatingNewFile() {
@unlink('/temp/test.log');
$log = new Log('/temp/test.log');
$this-&gt;assertFalse(file_exists('/temp/test.log'));
$log-&gt;message('Should write this to a file');
$this-&gt;assertTrue(file_exists('/temp/test.log'));
}
}
<strong>
$test = &amp;new TestOfLogging();
$test-&gt;run(new HtmlReporter());</strong>
?&gt;
</pre>
</p>
<p>
On failure the display looks like this...
<div class="demo">
<h1>testoflogging</h1>
<span class="fail">Fail</span>: testcreatingnewfile-&gt;True assertion failed.<br>
<div style="padding: 8px; margin-top: 1em; background-color: red; color: white;">1/1 test cases complete.
<strong>1</strong> passes and <strong>1</strong> fails.</div>
</div>
...and if it passes like this...
<div class="demo">
<h1>testoflogging</h1>
<div style="padding: 8px; margin-top: 1em; background-color: green; color: white;">1/1 test cases complete.
<strong>2</strong> passes and <strong>0</strong> fails.</div>
</div>
And if you get this...
<div class="demo">
<b>Fatal error</b>: Failed opening required '../classes/log.php' (include_path='') in <b>/home/marcus/projects/lastcraft/tutorial_tests/Log/tests/log_test.php</b> on line <b>7</b>
</div>
it means you're missing the <em>classes/Log.php</em> file that could look like...
<pre>
&lt;?php
class Log {
function Log($file_path) {
}
function message() {
}
}
?&gt;;
</pre>
</p>
<p>
<a class="target" name="group">
<h2>Building group tests</h2>
</a>
</p>
<p>
It is unlikely in a real application that we will only ever run
one test case.
This means that we need a way of grouping cases into a test
script that can, if need be, run every test in the application.
</p>
<p>
Our first step is to strip the includes and to undo our
previous hack...
<pre>
&lt;?php<strong>
require_once('../classes/log.php');</strong>
class TestOfLogging extends UnitTestCase {
function testCreatingNewFile() {
@unlink('/temp/test.log');
$log = new Log('/temp/test.log');
$this-&gt;assertFalse(file_exists('/temp/test.log'));
$log-&gt;message('Should write this to a file');
$this-&gt;assertTrue(file_exists('/temp/test.log'));<strong>
}
}
?&gt;</strong>
</pre>
Next we create a new file called <em>tests/all_tests.php</em>
and insert the following code...
<pre>
<strong>&lt;?php
require_once('simpletest/unit_tester.php');
require_once('simpletest/reporter.php');
$test = &amp;new GroupTest('All tests');
$test-&gt;addTestFile('log_test.php');
$test-&gt;run(new HtmlReporter());
?&gt;</strong>
</pre>
The method <span class="new_code">GroupTest::addTestFile()</span>
will include the test case file and read any new classes created
that are descended from <span class="new_code">SimpleTestCase</span>, of which
<span class="new_code">UnitTestCase</span> is one example.
Just the class names are stored for now, so that the test runner
can instantiate the class when it works its way
through your test suite.
</p>
<p>
For this to work properly the test case file should not blindly include
any other test case extensions that do not actually run tests.
This could result in extra test cases being counted during the test
run.
Hardly a major problem, but to avoid this inconvenience simply add
a <span class="new_code">SimpleTestOptions::ignore()</span> directive
somewhere in the test case file.
Also the test case file should not have been included
elsewhere or no cases will be added to this group test.
This would be a more serious error as if the test case classes are
already loaded by PHP the <span class="new_code">GroupTest::addTestFile()</span>
method will not detect them.
</p>
<p>
To display the results it is necessary only to invoke
<em>tests/all_tests.php</em> from the web server.
</p>
<p>
<a class="target" name="mock">
<h2>Using mock objects</h2>
</a>
</p>
<p>
Let's move further into the future.
</p>
<p>
Assume that our logging class is tested and completed.
Assume also that we are testing another class that is
required to write log messages, say a
<span class="new_code">SessionPool</span>.
We want to test a method that will probably end up looking
like this...
<pre>
<strong>
class SessionPool {
...
function logIn($username) {
...
$this-&gt;_log-&gt;message("User $username logged in.");
...
}
...
}
</strong>
</pre>
In the spirit of reuse we are using our
<span class="new_code">Log</span> class.
A conventional test case might look like this...
<pre>
<strong>
&lt;?php
require_once('../classes/log.php');
require_once('../classes/session_pool.php');
class TestOfSessionLogging extends UnitTestCase {
function setUp() {
@unlink('/temp/test.log');
}
function tearDown() {
@unlink('/temp/test.log');
}
function testLogInIsLogged() {
$log = new Log('/temp/test.log');
$session_pool = &amp;new SessionPool($log);
$session_pool-&gt;logIn('fred');
$messages = file('/temp/test.log');
$this-&gt;assertEqual($messages[0], "User fred logged in.\n");
}
}
?&gt;</strong>
</pre>
This test case design is not all bad, but it could be improved.
We are spending time fiddling with log files which are
not part of our test. Worse, we have created close ties
with the <span class="new_code">Log</span> class and
this test.
What if we don't use files any more, but use ths
<em>syslog</em> library instead?
Did you notice the extra carriage return in the message?
Was that added by the logger?
What if it also added a time stamp or other data?
</p>
<p>
The only part that we really want to test is that a particular
message was sent to the logger.
We reduce coupling if we can pass in a fake logging class
that simply records the message calls for testing, but
takes no action.
It would have to look exactly like our original though.
</p>
<p>
If the fake object doesn't write to a file then we save on deleting
the file before and after each test. We could save even more
test code if the fake object would kindly run the assertion for us.
<p>
</p>
Too good to be true?
Luckily we can create such an object easily...
<pre>
&lt;?php
require_once('../classes/log.php');
require_once('../classes/session_pool.php');<strong>
Mock::generate('Log');</strong>
class TestOfSessionLogging extends UnitTestCase {
function testLogInIsLogged() {<strong>
$log = &amp;new MockLog($this);
$log-&gt;expectOnce('message', array('User fred logged in.'));</strong>
$session_pool = &amp;new SessionPool($log);
$session_pool-&gt;logIn('fred');<strong>
$log-&gt;tally();</strong>
}
}
?&gt;
</pre>
The <span class="new_code">tally()</span> call is needed to
tell the mock object that time is up for the expected call
count.
Without it the mock would wait forever for the method
call to come in without ever actually notifying the test case.
The other test will be triggered when the call to
<span class="new_code">message()</span> is invoked on the
<span class="new_code">MockLog</span> object.
The mock call will trigger a parameter comparison and then send the
resulting pass or fail event to the test display.
Wildcards can be included here too so as to prevent tests
becoming too specific.
</p>
<p>
The mock objects in the SimpleTest suite can have arbitrary
return values set, sequences of returns, return values
selected according to the incoming arguments, sequences of
parameter expectations and limits on the number of times
a method is to be invoked.
</p>
<p>
For this test to run the mock objects library must have been
included in the test suite, say in <em>all_tests.php</em>.
</p>
<p>
<a class="target" name="web">
<h2>Web page testing</h2>
</a>
</p>
<p>
One of the requirements of web sites is that they produce web
pages.
If you are building a project top-down and you want to fully
integrate testing along the way then you will want a way of
automatically navigating a site and examining output for
correctness.
This is the job of a web tester.
</p>
<p>
The web testing in SimpleTest is fairly primitive, there is
no JavaScript for example.
To give an idea here is a trivial example where a home
page is fetched, from which we navigate to an "about"
page and then test some client determined content.
<pre>
&lt;?php<strong>
require_once('simpletest/web_tester.php');</strong>
require_once('simpletest/reporter.php');
<strong>
class TestOfAbout extends WebTestCase {
function setUp() {
$this-&gt;get('http://test-server/index.php');
$this-&gt;clickLink('About');
}
function testSearchEngineOptimisations() {
$this-&gt;assertTitle('A long title about us for search engines');
$this-&gt;assertWantedPattern('/a popular keyphrase/i');
}
}</strong>
$test = &amp;new TestOfAbout();
$test-&gt;run(new HtmlReporter());
?&gt;
</pre>
With this code as an acceptance test you can ensure that
the content always meets the specifications of both the
developers and the other project stakeholders.
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/simpletest/"><img src="http://sourceforge.net/sflogo.php?group_id=76550&amp;type=5" width="210" height="62" border="0" alt="SourceForge.net Logo"></a>
</p>
</div>
<div class="copyright">
Copyright<br>Marcus Baker, Jason Sweat, Perrick Penet 2004
</div>
</body>
</html>