cbcc693e36
git-subtree-dir: docs git-subtree-mainline:271bd37ad3
git-subtree-split:8fcf2d4501
377 lines
11 KiB
ReStructuredText
377 lines
11 KiB
ReStructuredText
Aggregate Fields
|
|
================
|
|
|
|
.. sectionauthor:: Benjamin Eberlei <kontakt@beberlei.de>
|
|
|
|
You will often come across the requirement to display aggregate
|
|
values of data that can be computed by using the MIN, MAX, COUNT or
|
|
SUM SQL functions. For any ORM this is a tricky issue
|
|
traditionally. Doctrine 2 offers several ways to get access to
|
|
these values and this article will describe all of them from
|
|
different perspectives.
|
|
|
|
You will see that aggregate fields can become very explicit
|
|
features in your domain model and how this potentially complex
|
|
business rules can be easily tested.
|
|
|
|
An example model
|
|
----------------
|
|
|
|
Say you want to model a bank account and all their entries. Entries
|
|
into the account can either be of positive or negative money
|
|
values. Each account has a credit limit and the account is never
|
|
allowed to have a balance below that value.
|
|
|
|
For simplicity we live in a world were money is composed of
|
|
integers only. Also we omit the receiver/sender name, stated reason
|
|
for transfer and the execution date. These all would have to be
|
|
added on the ``Entry`` object.
|
|
|
|
Our entities look like:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: php
|
|
|
|
<?php
|
|
namespace Bank\Entities;
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* @Entity
|
|
*/
|
|
class Account
|
|
{
|
|
/** @Id @GeneratedValue @Column(type="integer") */
|
|
private $id;
|
|
|
|
/** @Column(type="string", unique=true) */
|
|
private $no;
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* @OneToMany(targetEntity="Entry", mappedBy="account", cascade={"persist"})
|
|
*/
|
|
private $entries;
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* @Column(type="integer")
|
|
*/
|
|
private $maxCredit = 0;
|
|
|
|
public function __construct($no, $maxCredit = 0)
|
|
{
|
|
$this->no = $no;
|
|
$this->maxCredit = $maxCredit;
|
|
$this->entries = new \Doctrine\Common\Collections\ArrayCollection();
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* @Entity
|
|
*/
|
|
class Entry
|
|
{
|
|
/** @Id @GeneratedValue @Column(type="integer") */
|
|
private $id;
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* @ManyToOne(targetEntity="Account", inversedBy="entries")
|
|
*/
|
|
private $account;
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* @Column(type="integer")
|
|
*/
|
|
private $amount;
|
|
|
|
public function __construct($account, $amount)
|
|
{
|
|
$this->account = $account;
|
|
$this->amount = $amount;
|
|
// more stuff here, from/to whom, stated reason, execution date and such
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
public function getAmount()
|
|
{
|
|
return $this->amount;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Using DQL
|
|
---------
|
|
|
|
The Doctrine Query Language allows you to select for aggregate
|
|
values computed from fields of your Domain Model. You can select
|
|
the current balance of your account by calling:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: php
|
|
|
|
<?php
|
|
$dql = "SELECT SUM(e.amount) AS balance FROM Bank\Entities\Entry e " .
|
|
"WHERE e.account = ?1";
|
|
$balance = $em->createQuery($dql)
|
|
->setParameter(1, $myAccountId)
|
|
->getSingleScalarResult();
|
|
|
|
The ``$em`` variable in this (and forthcoming) example holds the
|
|
Doctrine ``EntityManager``. We create a query for the SUM of all
|
|
amounts (negative amounts are withdraws) and retrieve them as a
|
|
single scalar result, essentially return only the first column of
|
|
the first row.
|
|
|
|
This approach is simple and powerful, however it has a serious
|
|
drawback. We have to execute a specific query for the balance
|
|
whenever we need it.
|
|
|
|
To implement a powerful domain model we would rather have access to
|
|
the balance from our ``Account`` entity during all times (even if
|
|
the Account was not persisted in the database before!).
|
|
|
|
Also an additional requirement is the max credit per ``Account``
|
|
rule.
|
|
|
|
We cannot reliably enforce this rule in our ``Account`` entity with
|
|
the DQL retrieval of the balance. There are many different ways to
|
|
retrieve accounts. We cannot guarantee that we can execute the
|
|
aggregation query for all these use-cases, let alone that a
|
|
userland programmer checks this balance against newly added
|
|
entries.
|
|
|
|
Using your Domain Model
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
``Account`` and all the ``Entry`` instances are connected through a
|
|
collection, which means we can compute this value at runtime:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: php
|
|
|
|
<?php
|
|
class Account
|
|
{
|
|
// .. previous code
|
|
public function getBalance()
|
|
{
|
|
$balance = 0;
|
|
foreach ($this->entries AS $entry) {
|
|
$balance += $entry->getAmount();
|
|
}
|
|
return $balance;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Now we can always call ``Account::getBalance()`` to access the
|
|
current account balance.
|
|
|
|
To enforce the max credit rule we have to implement the "Aggregate
|
|
Root" pattern as described in Eric Evans book on Domain Driven
|
|
Design. Described with one sentence, an aggregate root controls the
|
|
instance creation, access and manipulation of its children.
|
|
|
|
In our case we want to enforce that new entries can only added to
|
|
the ``Account`` by using a designated method. The ``Account`` is
|
|
the aggregate root of this relation. We can also enforce the
|
|
correctness of the bi-directional ``Account`` <-> ``Entry``
|
|
relation with this method:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: php
|
|
|
|
<?php
|
|
class Account
|
|
{
|
|
public function addEntry($amount)
|
|
{
|
|
$this->assertAcceptEntryAllowed($amount);
|
|
|
|
$e = new Entry($this, $amount);
|
|
$this->entries[] = $e;
|
|
return $e;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Now look at the following test-code for our entities:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: php
|
|
|
|
<?php
|
|
class AccountTest extends \PHPUnit_Framework_TestCase
|
|
{
|
|
public function testAddEntry()
|
|
{
|
|
$account = new Account("123456", $maxCredit = 200);
|
|
$this->assertEquals(0, $account->getBalance());
|
|
|
|
$account->addEntry(500);
|
|
$this->assertEquals(500, $account->getBalance());
|
|
|
|
$account->addEntry(-700);
|
|
$this->assertEquals(-200, $account->getBalance());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
public function testExceedMaxLimit()
|
|
{
|
|
$account = new Account("123456", $maxCredit = 200);
|
|
|
|
$this->setExpectedException("Exception");
|
|
$account->addEntry(-1000);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
To enforce our rule we can now implement the assertion in
|
|
``Account::addEntry``:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: php
|
|
|
|
<?php
|
|
class Account
|
|
{
|
|
private function assertAcceptEntryAllowed($amount)
|
|
{
|
|
$futureBalance = $this->getBalance() + $amount;
|
|
$allowedMinimalBalance = ($this->maxCredit * -1);
|
|
if ($futureBalance < $allowedMinimalBalance) {
|
|
throw new Exception("Credit Limit exceeded, entry is not allowed!");
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
We haven't talked to the entity manager for persistence of our
|
|
account example before. You can call
|
|
``EntityManager::persist($account)`` and then
|
|
``EntityManager::flush()`` at any point to save the account to the
|
|
database. All the nested ``Entry`` objects are automatically
|
|
flushed to the database also.
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: php
|
|
|
|
<?php
|
|
$account = new Account("123456", 200);
|
|
$account->addEntry(500);
|
|
$account->addEntry(-200);
|
|
$em->persist($account);
|
|
$em->flush();
|
|
|
|
The current implementation has a considerable drawback. To get the
|
|
balance, we have to initialize the complete ``Account::$entries``
|
|
collection, possibly a very large one. This can considerably hurt
|
|
the performance of your application.
|
|
|
|
Using an Aggregate Field
|
|
------------------------
|
|
|
|
To overcome the previously mentioned issue (initializing the whole
|
|
entries collection) we want to add an aggregate field called
|
|
"balance" on the Account and adjust the code in
|
|
``Account::getBalance()`` and ``Account:addEntry()``:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: php
|
|
|
|
<?php
|
|
class Account
|
|
{
|
|
/**
|
|
* @Column(type="integer")
|
|
*/
|
|
private $balance = 0;
|
|
|
|
public function getBalance()
|
|
{
|
|
return $this->balance;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
public function addEntry($amount)
|
|
{
|
|
$this->assertAcceptEntryAllowed($amount);
|
|
|
|
$e = new Entry($this, $amount);
|
|
$this->entries[] = $e;
|
|
$this->balance += $amount;
|
|
return $e;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
This is a very simple change, but all the tests still pass. Our
|
|
account entities return the correct balance. Now calling the
|
|
``Account::getBalance()`` method will not occur the overhead of
|
|
loading all entries anymore. Adding a new Entry to the
|
|
``Account::$entities`` will also not initialize the collection
|
|
internally.
|
|
|
|
Adding a new entry is therefore very performant and explicitly
|
|
hooked into the domain model. It will only update the account with
|
|
the current balance and insert the new entry into the database.
|
|
|
|
Tackling Race Conditions with Aggregate Fields
|
|
----------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Whenever you denormalize your database schema race-conditions can
|
|
potentially lead to inconsistent state. See this example:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: php
|
|
|
|
<?php
|
|
// The Account $accId has a balance of 0 and a max credit limit of 200:
|
|
// request 1 account
|
|
$account1 = $em->find('Bank\Entities\Account', $accId);
|
|
|
|
// request 2 account
|
|
$account2 = $em->find('Bank\Entities\Account', $accId);
|
|
|
|
$account1->addEntry(-200);
|
|
$account2->addEntry(-200);
|
|
|
|
// now request 1 and 2 both flush the changes.
|
|
|
|
The aggregate field ``Account::$balance`` is now -200, however the
|
|
SUM over all entries amounts yields -400. A violation of our max
|
|
credit rule.
|
|
|
|
You can use both optimistic or pessimistic locking to save-guard
|
|
your aggregate fields against this kind of race-conditions. Reading
|
|
Eric Evans DDD carefully he mentions that the "Aggregate Root"
|
|
(Account in our example) needs a locking mechanism.
|
|
|
|
Optimistic locking is as easy as adding a version column:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: php
|
|
|
|
<?php
|
|
class Amount
|
|
{
|
|
/** @Column(type="integer") @Version */
|
|
private $version;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
The previous example would then throw an exception in the face of
|
|
whatever request saves the entity last (and would create the
|
|
inconsistent state).
|
|
|
|
Pessimistic locking requires an additional flag set on the
|
|
``EntityManager::find()`` call, enabling write locking directly in
|
|
the database using a FOR UPDATE.
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: php
|
|
|
|
<?php
|
|
use Doctrine\DBAL\LockMode;
|
|
|
|
$account = $em->find('Bank\Entities\Account', $accId, LockMode::PESSIMISTIC_READ);
|
|
|
|
Keeping Updates and Deletes in Sync
|
|
-----------------------------------
|
|
|
|
The example shown in this article does not allow changes to the
|
|
value in ``Entry``, which considerably simplifies the effort to
|
|
keep ``Account::$balance`` in sync. If your use-case allows fields
|
|
to be updated or related entities to be removed you have to
|
|
encapsulate this logic in your "Aggregate Root" entity and adjust
|
|
the aggregate field accordingly.
|
|
|
|
Conclusion
|
|
----------
|
|
|
|
This article described how to obtain aggregate values using DQL or
|
|
your domain model. It showed how you can easily add an aggregate
|
|
field that offers serious performance benefits over iterating all
|
|
the related objects that make up an aggregate value. Finally I
|
|
showed how you can ensure that your aggregate fields do not get out
|
|
of sync due to race-conditions and concurrent access.
|
|
|
|
|