1
0
mirror of synced 2024-12-15 07:36:03 +03:00
doctrine2/vendor/simpletest/docs/en/overview.html
2007-01-28 22:39:21 +00:00

423 lines
19 KiB
HTML

<html>
<head>
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<title>
Overview and feature list for the SimpleTest PHP unit tester and web tester
</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="docs.css" title="Styles">
</head>
<body>
<div class="menu_back">
<div class="menu">
<h2>
<a href="index.html">SimpleTest</a>
</h2>
<ul>
<li>
<span class="chosen">Overview</span>
</li>
<li>
<a href="unit_test_documentation.html">Unit tester</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="group_test_documentation.html">Group tests</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="server_stubs_documentation.html">Server stubs</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="mock_objects_documentation.html">Mock objects</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="partial_mocks_documentation.html">Partial mocks</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="reporter_documentation.html">Reporting</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="expectation_documentation.html">Expectations</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="web_tester_documentation.html">Web tester</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="form_testing_documentation.html">Testing forms</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="authentication_documentation.html">Authentication</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="browser_documentation.html">Scriptable browser</a>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<h1>Overview of SimpleTest</h1>
<div class="content">
<p>
<a class="target" name="summary">
<h2>What is SimpleTest?</h2>
</a>
</p>
<p>
The heart of SimpleTest is a testing framework built around
test case classes.
These are written as extensions of base test case classes,
each extended with methods that actually contain test code.
Top level test scripts then invoke the <span class="new_code">run()</span>
methods on every one of these test cases in order.
Each test method is written to invoke various assertions that
the developer expects to be true such as
<span class="new_code">assertEqual()</span>.
If the expectation is correct, then a successful result is dispatched to the
observing test reporter, but any failure triggers an alert
and a description of the mismatch.
</p>
<p>
A <a href="unit_test_documentation.html">test case</a> looks like this...
<pre>
&lt;?php
class <strong>MyTestCase</strong> extends UnitTestCase {
<strong>
function testLog() {
$log = &amp;new Log('my.log');
$log-&gt;message('Hello');
$this-&gt;assertTrue(file_exists('my.log'));
}</strong>
}
?&gt;
</pre>
</p>
<p>
These tools are designed for the developer.
Tests are written in the PHP language itself more or less
as the application itself is built.
The advantage of using PHP itself as the testing language is that
there are no new languages to learn, testing can start straight away,
and the developer can test any part of the code.
Basically, all parts that can be accessed by the application code can also be
accessed by the test code if they are in the same language.
</p>
<p>
The simplest type of test case is the
<a href="unit_tester_documentation.html">UnitTestCase</a>.
This class of test case includes standard tests for equality,
references and pattern matching.
All these test the typical expectations of what you would
expect the result of a function or method to be.
This is by far the most common type of test in the daily
routine of development, making up about 95% of test cases.
</p>
<p>
The top level task of a web application though is not to
produce correct output from its methods and objects, but
to generate web pages.
The <a href="web_tester_documentation.html">WebTestCase</a> class tests web
pages.
It simulates a web browser requesting a page, complete with
cookies, proxies, secure connections, authentication, forms, frames and most
navigation elements.
With this type of test case, the developer can assert that
information is present in the page and that forms and
sessions are handled correctly.
</p>
<p>
A <a href="web_tester_documentation.html">WebTestCase</a> looks like this...
<pre>
&lt;?php
class <strong>MySiteTest</strong> extends WebTestCase {
<strong>
function testHomePage() {
$this-&gt;get('http://www.my-site.com/index.php');
$this-&gt;assertTitle('My Home Page');
$this-&gt;clickLink('Contact');
$this-&gt;assertTitle('Contact me');
$this-&gt;assertWantedPattern('/Email me at/');
}</strong>
}
?&gt;
</pre>
</p>
<p>
<a class="target" name="features">
<h2>Feature list</h2>
</a>
</p>
<p>
The following is a very rough outline of past and future features
and their expected point of release.
I am afraid it is liable to change without warning as meeting the
milestones rather depends on time available.
Green stuff has been coded, but not necessarily released yet.
If you have a pressing need for a green but unreleased feature
then you should check-out the code from sourceforge CVS directly.
A released feature is marked as "Done".
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Feature</th><th>Description</th><th>Release</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Unit test case</td>
<td>Core test case class and assertions</td>
<td style="color: green;">Done</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Html display</td>
<td>Simplest possible display</td>
<td style="color: green;">Done</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Autoloading of test cases</td>
<td>
Reading a file with test cases and loading them into a
group test automatically
</td>
<td style="color: green;">Done</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mock objects code generator</td>
<td>
Objects capable of simulating other objects removing
test dependencies
</td>
<td style="color: green;">Done</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Server stubs</td>
<td>
Mocks without expectations to be used outside of test cases,
e.g. for prototyping
</td>
<td style="color: green;">Done</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Integration of other unit testers</td>
<td>
The ability to read and simulate test cases from PHPUnit
and PEAR::PhpUnit
</td>
<td style="color: green;">Done</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Web test case</td>
<td>Basic pattern matching of fetched pages</td>
<td style="color: green;">Done</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>HTML parsing of pages</td>
<td>Allows link following and title tag matching</td>
<td style="color: green;">Done</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Partial mocks</td>
<td>
Mocking parts of a class for testing less than a class
or for complex simulations
</td>
<td style="color: green;">Done</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Web cookie handling</td>
<td>Correct handling of cookies when fetching pages</td>
<td style="color: green;">Done</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Following redirects</td>
<td>Page fetching automatically follows 300 redirects</td>
<td style="color: green;">Done</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Form parsing</td>
<td>Ability to submit simple forms and read default form values</td>
<td style="color: green;">Done</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Command line interface</td>
<td>Test display without the need of a web browser</td>
<td style="color: green;">Done</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Exposure of expectation classes</td>
<td>Can create precise tests with mocks as well as test cases</td>
<td style="color: green;">Done</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XML output and parsing</td>
<td>
Allows multi host testing and the integration of acceptance
testing extensions
</td>
<td style="color: green;">Done</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Command line test case</td>
<td>Allows testing of utilities and file handling</td>
<td style="color: green;">Done</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>PHP Documentor compatibility</td>
<td>Fully generated class level documentation</td>
<td style="color: green;">Done</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Browser interface</td>
<td>
Exposure of lower level web browser interface for more
detailed test cases
</td>
<td style="color: green;">Done</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>HTTP authentication</td>
<td>
Fetching protected web pages with basic authentication
only
</td>
<td style="color: green;">Done</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Browser navigation buttons</td>
<td>Back, forward and retry</td>
<td style="color: green;">Done</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>SSL support</td>
<td>Can connect to https: pages</td>
<td style="color: green;">Done</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Proxy support</td>
<td>Can connect via. common proxies</td>
<td style="color: green;">Done</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Frames support</td>
<td>Handling of frames in web test cases</td>
<td style="color: green;">Done</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Improved display</td>
<td>Better web GUI with tree display of test cases</td>
<td style="color: red;">1.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Localisation</td>
<td>Messages abstracted and code generated from XML</td>
<td style="color: red;">1.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>File upload testing</td>
<td>Can simulate the input type file tag</td>
<td style="color: red;">1.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mocking interfaces</td>
<td>Can generate mock objects to interfaces as well as classes</td>
<td style="color: red;">2.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Testing exceptions</td>
<td>Similar to testing PHP errors</td>
<td style="color: red;">2.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XPath searching of elements</td>
<td>Can make use of HTML tidy for faster and more flexible content matching</td>
<td style="color: red;">2.0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
PHP5 migraton will start straight after the version 1.1 series,
whereupon PHP4 will no longer be supported.
SimpleTest is currently compatible with PHP5, but will not
make use of all of the new features until version 2.
</p>
<p>
<a class="target" name="resources">
<h2>Web resources for testing</h2>
</a>
</p>
<p>
Process is at least as important as tools.
The type of process that makes the heaviest use of a developer's
testing tool is of course
<a href="http://www.extremeprogramming.org/">Extreme Programming</a>.
This is one of the
<a href="http://www.agilealliance.com/articles/index">Agile Methodologies</a>
which combine various practices to "flatten the cost curve" of software development.
More extreme still is <a href="http://www.testdriven.com/modules/news/">Test Driven Development</a>,
where you very strictly adhere to the rule of no coding until you have a test.
If you're more of a planner or believe that experience trumps evolution,
you may prefer the
<a href="http://www.therationaledge.com/content/dec_01/f_spiritOfTheRUP_pk.html">RUP</a> approach.
I haven't tried it, but even I can see that you will need test tools (see figure 9).
</p>
<p>
Most unit testers clone <a href="http://www.junit.org/">JUnit</a> to some degree,
as far as the interface at least. There is a wealth of information on the
JUnit site including the
<a href="http://junit.sourceforge.net/doc/faq/faq.htm">FAQ</a>
which contains plenty of general advice on testing.
Once you get bitten by the bug you will certainly appreciate the phrase
<a href="http://junit.sourceforge.net/doc/testinfected/testing.htm">test infected</a>
coined by Eric Gamma.
If you are still reviewing which unit tester to use the main choices
are <a href="http://phpunit.sourceforge.net/">PHPUnit</a>
and <a href="http://pear.php.net/manual/en/package.php.phpunit.php">Pear PHP::PHPUnit</a>.
They currently lack a lot of features found in
<a href="http://www.lastcraft.com/simple_test.php">SimpleTest</a>, but the PEAR
version at least has been upgraded for PHP5 and is recommended if you are porting
existing <a href="http://www.junit.org/">JUnit</a> test cases.
</p>
<p>
Library writers don't seem to ship tests with their code very often
which is a shame.
Library code that includes tests can be more safely refactored and
the test code can act as additional documentation in a fairly standard
form.
This can save trawling the source code for clues when problems occour,
especially when upgrading such a library.
Libraries using SimpleTest for their unit testing include
<a href="http://wact.sourceforge.net/">WACT</a> and
<a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/htmlsax">PEAR::XML_HTMLSax</a>.
</p>
<p>
There is currently a sad lack of material on mock objects, which is a shame
as unit testing without them is a lot more work.
The <a href="http://www.sidewize.com/company/mockobjects.pdf">original mock objects paper</a>
is very Java focused, but still worth a read.
As a new technology there are plenty of discussions and debate on how to use mocks,
often on Wikis such as
<a href="http://xpdeveloper.com/cgi-bin/oldwiki.cgi?MockObjects">Extreme Tuesday</a>
or <a href="http://www.mockobjects.com/wiki/MocksObjectsPaper">www.mockobjects.com</a>
or <a href="http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?MockObject">the original C2 Wiki</a>.
Injecting mocks into a class is the main area of debate for which this
<a href="http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-mocktest.html">paper on IBM</a>
makes a good starting point.
</p>
<p>
There are plenty of web testing tools, but most are written in Java and
tutorials and advice are rather thin on the ground.
The only hope is to look at the documentation for
<a href="http://httpunit.sourceforge.net/">HTTPUnit</a>,
<a href="http://htmlunit.sourceforge.net/">HTMLUnit</a>
or <a href="http://jwebunit.sourceforge.net/">JWebUnit</a> and hope for clues.
There are some XML driven test frameworks, but again most
require Java to run.
As SimpleTest does not support JavaScript you would probably
have to look at these tools anyway if you have highly dynamic
pages.
</p>
</div>
<div class="copyright">
Copyright<br>Marcus Baker, Jason Sweat, Perrick Penet 2004
</div>
</body>
</html>