Change Tracking Policies ======================== Change tracking is the process of determining what has changed in managed entities since the last time they were synchronized with the database. Doctrine provides 3 different change tracking policies, each having its particular advantages and disadvantages. The change tracking policy can be defined on a per-class basis (or more precisely, per-hierarchy). Deferred Implicit ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The deferred implicit policy is the default change tracking policy and the most convenient one. With this policy, Doctrine detects the changes by a property-by-property comparison at commit time and also detects changes to entities or new entities that are referenced by other managed entities ("persistence by reachability"). Although the most convenient policy, it can have negative effects on performance if you are dealing with large units of work (see "Understanding the Unit of Work"). Since Doctrine can't know what has changed, it needs to check all managed entities for changes every time you invoke EntityManager#flush(), making this operation rather costly. Deferred Explicit ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The deferred explicit policy is similar to the deferred implicit policy in that it detects changes through a property-by-property comparison at commit time. The difference is that Doctrine 2 only considers entities that have been explicitly marked for change detection through a call to EntityManager#persist(entity) or through a save cascade. All other entities are skipped. This policy therefore gives improved performance for larger units of work while sacrificing the behavior of "automatic dirty checking". Therefore, flush() operations are potentially cheaper with this policy. The negative aspect this has is that if you have a rather large application and you pass your objects through several layers for processing purposes and business tasks you may need to track yourself which entities have changed on the way so you can pass them to EntityManager#persist(). This policy can be configured as follows: .. code-block:: php _listeners[] = $listener; } } Then, in each property setter of this class or derived classes, you need to notify all the ``PropertyChangedListener`` instances. As an example we add a convenience method on ``MyEntity`` that shows this behaviour: .. code-block:: php _listeners) { foreach ($this->_listeners as $listener) { $listener->propertyChanged($this, $propName, $oldValue, $newValue); } } } public function setData($data) { if ($data != $this->data) { $this->_onPropertyChanged('data', $this->data, $data); $this->data = $data; } } } You have to invoke ``_onPropertyChanged`` inside every method that changes the persistent state of ``MyEntity``. The check whether the new value is different from the old one is not mandatory but recommended. That way you also have full control over when you consider a property changed. The negative point of this policy is obvious: You need implement an interface and write some plumbing code. But also note that we tried hard to keep this notification functionality abstract. Strictly speaking, it has nothing to do with the persistence layer and the Doctrine ORM or DBAL. You may find that property notification events come in handy in many other scenarios as well. As mentioned earlier, the ``Doctrine\Common`` namespace is not that evil and consists solely of very small classes and interfaces that have almost no external dependencies (none to the DBAL and none to the ORM) and that you can easily take with you should you want to swap out the persistence layer. This change tracking policy does not introduce a dependency on the Doctrine DBAL/ORM or the persistence layer. The positive point and main advantage of this policy is its effectiveness. It has the best performance characteristics of the 3 policies with larger units of work and a flush() operation is very cheap when nothing has changed.