RetailCRM-Mirror/doctrine2
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of synced 2024-12-14 15:16:04 +03:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge pull request #37 from mdpatrick/associations_grammar_errors

Browse Source 
Fixed minor grammatical errors in working-with-associations.rst
This commit is contained in:
Guilherme Blanco 2011-07-30 15:40:12 -07:00
commit 67818ea2cc
1 changed files with 15 additions and 13 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

28
en/reference/working-with-associations.rst
View File

@ -246,8 +246,8 @@ the database permanently.
Notice how both sides of the bidirectional association are always
updated. Unidirectional associations are consequently simpler to
handle. Also note that if you type-hint your methods, i.e.
``setAddress(Address $address)``, then PHP does only allows null
handle. Also note that if you use type-hinting in your methods, i.e.
``setAddress(Address $address)``, PHP will only allow null
values if ``null`` is set as default value. Otherwise
setAddress(null) will fail for removing the association. If you
insist on type-hinting a typical way to deal with this is to
@ -279,8 +279,9 @@ entities that have been re-added to the collection.
Say you clear a collection of tags by calling
``$post->getTags()->clear();`` and then call
``$post->getTags()->add($tag)``. This will not recognize tag being
already added before and issue two database calls.
``$post->getTags()->add($tag)``. This will not recognize the tag having
already been added previously and will consequently issue two separate database
calls.
Association Management Methods
------------------------------
@ -380,9 +381,9 @@ as your preferences.
Synchronizing Bidirectional Collections
---------------------------------------
In the case of Many-To-Many associations you as the developer are
responsible to keep the collections on the owning and inverse side
up in sync, when you apply changes to them. Doctrine can only
In the case of Many-To-Many associations you as the developer have the
responsibility of keeping the collections on the owning and inverse side
in sync when you apply changes to them. Doctrine can only
guarantee a consistent state for the hydration, not for your client
code.
@ -468,7 +469,7 @@ code would fail if you removed the call to
cascade the persist operation to all nested entities that are new
as well.
More complicated is the deletion of all a users comments when he is
More complicated is the deletion of all of a user's comments when he is
removed from the system:
.. code-block:: php
@ -590,7 +591,7 @@ and StandingData:
}
}
Now two examples what happens when you remove the references:
Now two examples of what happens when you remove the references:
.. code-block:: php
@ -602,7 +603,8 @@ Now two examples what happens when you remove the references:
$em->flush();
In this case you have only changed the ``Contact`` entity but you removed
the references for standing data and one address reference. When flush is called
not only are the references removed but both the old standing data and the one
address entity are also deleted from the database.
In this case you have not only changed the ``Contact`` entity itself but
you have also removed the references for standing data and as well as one
address reference. When flush is called not only are the references removed
but both the old standing data and the one address entity are also deleted
from the database.